Q1 journal selection
Scope fit, quartile, review time and APC compared for your paper.
Covered on Day 1 ›Admissions open SCI Q1 Research Paper Training Program
Built for researchers in Large Language Models
You write one part of your own paper each day in a live session. A mentor reviews it before the next day starts. On Day 12 you submit to the Q1 journal you chose on Day 1.
Manuscripts formatted and positioned for
Five steps from your first message to a manuscript under review.
Tell us your area and where your paper stands.
We check that your work fits the 12-day track and agree a batch.
One manuscript section a day, reviewed before the next session.
Your paper goes to your chosen Q1 journal with a submission ID.
You leave with a response-letter template for the revision round.
Pick a phase or a day. Each day shows the live session, your practice tasks, and what you hand in. The manuscript fills in with each day's colour.
| Day | Topic | Training focus | You hand in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | Journal targeting and research gap | Q1 SCI-indexed journal selection based on research; Research gap identification | Journal shortlist with scope-fit notes and an approved gap statement |
| Day 2 | Problem formulation, title and keywords | Problem formulation; Title crafting & keywords optimization strategy | Problem statement, contribution list, final title and keywords |
| Day 3 | Literature review and survey | Comprehensive literature review & survey; Citation management | Related Work draft, comparison table and a clean .bib library |
| Day 4 | Introduction, background and motivation | Introduction with background & motivation | Complete Introduction, about 1–1.5 two-column pages |
| Day 5 | Methodology and experimental design | Research methodology design & experimental setup | Methodology outline and experimental protocol table |
| Day 6 | Algorithm development and pseudocode | Algorithm development & pseudocode design | Proposed-method section with Algorithm 1 and complexity analysis |
| Day 7 | Mathematical formulation and theorem proofs | Mathematical formulation & theorem proofs | Formulation subsection with numbered equations and notation table |
| Day 8 | Implementation and code quality | Implementation using Python/TensorFlow/PyTorch; Code optimization & software engineering best practices | Working implementation with first results logged |
| Day 9 | Experiments, statistics and comparative evaluation | Statistical analysis & performance metrics; Results interpretation & comparative evaluation | Results tables with statistics and a Results and Discussion draft |
| Day 10 | Figures, diagrams and LaTeX formatting | Professional figures, charts & architecture diagrams; LaTeX document preparation & IEEE/Springer formatting | Full manuscript compiled in the journal's template |
| Day 11 | Abstract, reproducibility and references | Abstract structuring & impact statement writing; Reproducibility guidelines & GitHub repository setup; Citation management & reference formatting | Final abstract, public code repository and clean references |
| Day 12 | Desk-rejection check, submission and rebuttal | Desk rejection avoidance & submission strategies; Reviewer response letters & rebuttal writing | Manuscript submitted to your chosen Q1 journal, with a submission ID and a rebuttal template ready |
Answer three questions for an honest read on fit, and see which days will need the most of your time.
Bring work in any of these areas. Tap yours and it is added to your enquiry.
Sessions are live and online, so participants join from:
Everything a Q1 submission needs, taught hands-on and applied to your own paper.
Scope fit, quartile, review time and APC compared for your paper.
Covered on Day 1 ›A gap statement and contributions an editor can verify.
Covered on Day 2 ›Themed review, comparison table and a clean reference library.
Covered on Day 3 ›Datasets, fair baselines, metrics and ablations planned properly.
Covered on Day 5 ›Pseudocode, complexity analysis and checkable mathematics.
Covered on Day 6 ›Clean Python, PyTorch or TensorFlow code with tests and logging.
Covered on Day 8 ›Significance tests and results that explain why, not only what.
Covered on Day 9 ›Architecture diagrams, vector plots and IEEE or Springer templates.
Covered on Day 10 ›A public GitHub repository reviewers can run, with a DOI.
Covered on Day 11 ›Desk-rejection check, cover letter, submission, and a reviewer-response template.
Covered on Day 12 ›Twelve live days, daily mentor review, and your paper submitted by Day 12.
Ph.D., PDF (AI). Founder, CEO and Chief AI Scientist, AlgoProfessor AI R&D Solutions
Many publication services write the paper for you and promise acceptance. We teach you to write it, and we say plainly what we can and cannot promise.
One fee for the full 12 days. No staged charges.
₹1,50,000
for the 12-day program
US$2,000
for the 12-day program
Ph.D. scholars, faculty, postdoctoral researchers and industry researchers who have a research idea or early results in one of the listed areas and want to publish in an SCI Q1 journal.
Twelve days is fastest when you already have a working idea and some experiments. If you are starting from an idea only, say so in the form: the scoping call will tell you honestly whether your work fits the 12-day track.
No. Editors and reviewers decide acceptance, and any service that guarantees it should worry you. You leave with a well-prepared manuscript submitted to your chosen journal and a plan for the revision round.
You do. Mentors teach, review and line-edit, but the research, data, code and writing are yours. Authorship follows your institution's rules and the journal's policy, and Day 12 covers similarity checks and AI-use disclosure.
Every day has a live interactive session, then guided practice on your own manuscript, then mentor review before the next session.
No charges from AlgoProfessor beyond ₹1,50,000 or US$2,000. Some journals charge their own article processing fee (APC) for open access; Day 1 shows you how to check this before choosing a journal.
The submitted manuscript and its submission ID, the LaTeX source in your journal's template, your figure sources, a public code repository, and a reviewer-response template.